OUTCOME COMPARISON OF LASER-ASSISTED IN SITU KERATOMILEUSIS IN VARIOUS DEGREE OF MYOPIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ojkmi.v5i3.56Keywords:
efficacy index, LASIK, myopia, outcome, safety indexAbstract
Introduction: The femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (fs-LASIK) procedure is commonly used for myopia correction because of good efficacy, safety, and predictability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of the fs-LASIK procedure among myopia groups in Cicendo Eye Hospital from January to December 2021.
Methods: This retrospective study included 212 patients (399 eyes) and the data were obtained from medical records from January 2021 to December 2021 using ICD-10 coding for LASIK (S0800), consisting of fs-LASIK procedures. The outcome variables were safety index, and efficacy index.
Results: The median of safety index was not statistically significant different between groups, 1,00(0,50-1,67) in low myopia, 1,00(0,20-1,43) in moderate myopia, and 1,00(0,30-3,33) in high myopia. The median of efficacy index was statistically significant different between groups, 1,00(0,40-1,67) in low myopia, 1,00(0,20-1,43) in moderate myopia, and 1,00(0,30-3,33) in high myopia. The proportion of eye with UCVA > 6/12 on the first month after the procedure was higher in the mild myopia group (223;99,2%) than in moderate myopia (87;98,8%) and high myopia (77;88,5%) with p=0,0001. The proportion of eye with BCVA > 6/12 on the first month after the procedure was also higher in the mild myopia group (224;100%) than in moderate myopia (87;98,8%) and high myopia (82;94,3%) with p=0,0001.
Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference of the safety index between groups. The efficacy index was statistically significant different between groups.
Downloads
References
Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, dkk. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2017; 5(12):1221–34.
Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Y ekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, dan Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta- analysis. Journal of Current Ophthalmology. 2018; 30:3-22.
Halim A, Suganda R, Sirait SN, Memed FK, Syumarti, Rini M, dkk. Prevalence and associated factors of uncorrected refractive errors among school children in suburban areas in Bandung, Indonesia. Cogent Medicine. 2020; 7(1): 1-13.
Harris J, Mizuiri D, Ambrus A, dan Lum FC. Refractive errors and refractive surgery preferred practice pattern. San Fransisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2017. hlm. 12-15.
Bashir ZS, Ali MH, Anwar A, Ayub MH, dan Butt NH. Femto-LASIK: The recent innovation in laser assisted refractive surgery. J Pak Med Assoc; 2017; 67(4): 609-15.
Shah R. History and results; Indications and contraindications of SMILE compared with LASIK. Asia Pac J Opthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8: 371-6.
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, dan Mehta JS. Randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2019; 127: 724-9.
Yan H, Gong L, Huang W, Peng Y. Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia : a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol; 2017; 10(9): 1436-45.
Niparugs M, Tananuvat N, Chaidaroon W, Tangmonkongvoragul C, Ausayakhun S. Outcomes of LASIK for Myopia or Myopic Astigmatism Correction with the FS200 Femtosecond Laser and EX500 Excimer Laser Platform. Open J Ophthalmol; 2018; 12: 63-71.
Gomel N, Negari S, Frucht- Pery J, Wajnsztajn D, Strassman E, Solomon A. Predictive factors for efficacy and safety in refractive surgery for myopia. PLoS ONE; 2018; 13(12): 1-17.
Wallerstein A, Kam JW, Gaucin M, Adiguzel E, Bashour M, Kalevar A, dkk. Refractive, visual, and subjective quality of vision outcomes for very high myopia LASIK from − 10.00 to − 13.50 diopters. BMC Ophthalmology; 2020; 20(234): 1-10.
Anggriany FD dan Heryati S. Karakteristik dan gambaran hasil tindakan laser in situ keratomileus (LASIK) di Rumah Sakit Mata Cicendo periode januari 2008 sampai januari 2010. 2010.
Chairini A dan Heryati S. Gambaran klinis tindakan femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) dan small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) pada miopia dan astigmatisma miopia. 2016.
Ang M dan Wong TY. Updates on myopia, A clinical perspective. Singapore: Springer Open; 2022. hlm. 2-5.
Mori K, Kurihara T,Uchino M, Torii H, Kawashima M, Sasaki M, dkk. High myopia and its associated factors in JPHC- NEXT eye study: A cross- sectional observational study. J Clin Med; 2019(8): 1-13.
Chua D, Htoon HM, Lim L, Chan C, Mehta JS, Tan DT, dkk. Eighteen-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 53731 eyes. Br J Ophthalmol; 2018: 1-7.
Park SH, Che CY, Kim SI, Park CY, Lee JH, Kim YH, dkk. Comparison of clinical outcome after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with low or high myopia. Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(11): 1780-7.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oftalmologi: Jurnal Kesehatan Mata Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 